 |
|
Bloggereid ähvardab poliitiline suukorv
postitas mauri ja-enam-ei-blogi-me-sirtsu-sohu-nüüd-logime osak. 16:58 4. märts, 2005
Mitte ainult Iraanis ei ole ajaveebnikel raskusi, ka jänkimaal ähvardab neid poliitiline regulatsioon. Föderaalne valimiskomisjon on nimelt hakanud tegelema 2002 aastast pärit kahtlase "Kampaaniate rahastamise seaduse" laiendamisega internetile.
Lühidalt on tegemist poliitiliste kampaaniate toetamist reguleeriva seadusandlusega, mille laiendamisel internetile võivad bloggerid olla sunnitud siia või sinna linkimise ning isegi mõne pressiteate postiloendisse edastamise eest trahvi maksma. Pressile on tehtud erand ning 2002 tehti häältega 4:2 valimiskomisjoni poolt ka internetile erand, kuid nüüd on see tühistatud. Nüüd tekibki küsimus, et kas ajaveebnikud on press või mitte. USA föderaalseaduse kohaselt ei pruugi nad kvalifitseeruda. Ingliskeelne sõnastus seadusest: "any news story, commentary, or editorial distributed through the facilities of any broadcasting station, newspaper, magazine, or other periodical publication, unless such facilities are owned or controlled by any political party, political committee, or candidate".
CNET News
< Shaolini tempel pürgib UNESCO kultuuriväärtuseks
| Kuidas teha Google mailikontost failikonto >
| |
| | |
|
Bloggereid ähvardab poliitiline suukorv
|
Logi sisse/tee kasutajakonto
| Top
| 8 kommentaari
| otsi arutelust
|
|
|
|
peenes kirjas:
Järgmised kommentaarid kuuluvad nende autoritele.
Meie ei vastuta nende eest kuidagi.
|
Iraanis inimesi pannakse 10ks aastaks vangi selle eest, et nad oma arvamust julgevad avaldada ja "solvavad usujuhti" jne..
Mida aga see seadus käsitleb on tegelikult, et kes võib teha poliitilist kampaaniat. Kuna USAs on kampaania-annetused ettevõtetelt keelatud ( nagu nüüd *lõpuks* ka meil ), siis bloggerite piiramine suures osas tuleb seetõttu, et keegi ei tea, kes bloggerit finantseerib. Samas, ma ei saa aru sellest loogikast, sest kui keegi ühe poole bloggereid finantseerib, siis võib keegi teine jällegi teise poole bloggereid rahastada? Milleks siinkohal tsensuur?
Ürituse võib vist ametlikult kokku võtta kui "piirata varjatud ja mitte mõõdetava KAMPAANIAtoetuse hulka" poliitilistele parteidele.
Sõnastus aga paraku on väga laiahaardeline vist..
"If Congress doesn't change the law, what kind of activities will the FEC have to target?"
"We're talking about any decision by an individual to put a link (to a political candidate) on their home page, set up a blog, send out mass e-mails, any kind of activity that can be done on the Internet."
Any kind of activity that can be done on the Internet - Absurd!
Kui nüüd hakata kriitiliselt mõtlema, siis võib kogu asi olla hoopis selle taga, et interneti abil kipub võim RAHA käest ära libisema. Raha eest saab meediakanaleid osta kampaaniaks, aga kui suur hulk vabatahtlikke mängu tuleb, kes on populaarsed, ilma, et oleks OSTNUD omale seda populaarsust ( ega ole ka müüdavad! ) siis pole rahal enam midagi kobiseda ja raha võib võimust ilma jääda.
Samas, raha eest saab ka netis kampaaniat teha!
Kui sõbralikke bloggereid pole olemas, saab neid LUUA! HA!
Väga tõenäoline, et ülla loosungi taga on ka traditsiooniliste meediaväljaannete (telekanalid/ajalehed) lobby saada suurem tükk valimiskampaaniatest kulutatavatest hiigelsummadest endale ja mitte loovutada turuosa amatööridele.
|
|
|
[ vasta sellele | artikkel
]
|
|
> Iraanis inimesi pannakse 10ks aastaks vangi selle eest, et
> nad oma arvamust julgevad avaldada ja "solvavad usujuhti" jne..
The owls are not what they seem...
Hossein Derakhshan (aka Hoder) [hoder.com] on recent bad news about Iranian 'bloggers' [hoder.com]
March 03, 2005
I reluctantly have to make a few points about the recent developments regarding the Iranian journalists and internet activists:
* It's sad to see Iranian young journalists arrested and convicted for their journalistic activates.
* I haven't seen any evidence that Arash, Mojataba, and a few others have been convicted for their blog entries. With a few dozen readers, they were hardly popular enough to threaten the regime via their weblogs. Neither had they disclosed classified information or documents. There are thousands of Persian blogs with releatively the same popularity containing equally harsh criticism of the regime and none of them have been sommuned or arrested yet.
* Arash is charged with working with Radio Farda, which Iran considers a propaganda outlet made by US government to topple the Iranian regime. Natioanl security council of Iran has apparently forbidden Iranian journalists and analysts, with a few exceptions such as Sadegh Zibakalam, to work or interview with Radio Farda and other radical anti-regime media outlets.
* Most of the recently convicted 'bloggers' have been prosecuted in courts out of Tehran. We should not forget that there are a lot of judges in these smaller judiciary centers who are willing to show themselves to higher officials so they can move to higher positions. They deliberately create controversy by their judgments to get some attention. As usual, many of their decisions will be reversed in appeal courts.
* Documents show that Arash's charges are about 'spying for the Americans' rather than his posts in his blog.
* It's unfortunate that Iranian regime defines 'spying' so vaguely and widely. It's not clear when an information exchange is considered spying. All of us, bloggers, who are writing about Iran in English, could be seen as spies. However, no blogger has been arrested for publishing news and opinion about Iran in English or other languages.
* Seems to me that some radical anti-regime groups are using blogs as covers for their members or sympathizers in Iran so if something happens to them, it would give them some safety and publicity in the Western media, especially because many of these of group do not have a good reputation among Western journalists and politicians and a journalistic or blogging cover can give members of these groups a much more positive image.
* After about a dozen Internet journalists and activists were released last month, no one has been arrested by the same or any other court in Tehran. Even though many of them spoke out about their horrible time in detention, they are all back to their normal lives. Omid Memarian, who had a blog before arrest, is now back blogging at his own newly designed website; Hanif Mazroui and Fereshteh Ghazi who didn't have blogs when arrested now are blogging.
|
|
|
[ vasta sellele | artikkel
]
|
|
|
Apple vs ThinkSecret. ThinkSecret peab kohtu käsul avalikustama oma allikad Apple'is kes neile infot lekitasid tulevaste toodete kohta. Ajakirjandusel kuulu järgi selliseid kohustusi ei ole.
http://apple.slashdot.org/apple/05/03/04/138234.sh tml?tid=123&tid=153&tid=3
|
|
|
[ vasta sellele | artikkel
]
|
|
|
sõnavabaduse piires võib vist ikka veel tegutseda.
|
|
|
[ vasta sellele | artikkel
]
|
|
kust see mõte üldse tulla saab, et blog võib olla ajakirjandus!?
kuidas jääb põhireeglitega nagu
1) fakti ja kommentaari eristamine
2) selgituse palumise kohustus süüdistatavalt poolelt
|
|
|
[ vasta sellele | artikkel
]
|
| |
|
|
|
