 |
 |
Pentagoni ametnikud 9/11 "ebatäpsuste" pärast uurimise all
postitas mauri pentakonna-kõhuvalu osak. 21:57 6th august, 2006
Tundmatu kirjasaatja viitas Agence Fance Presse loole, mis räägib, et Pentagon on andnud 11. septembri terroriakte uurinud erikomisjonile ohtralt valeinformatsiooni ning nüüd on algatatud selle asjus uurimine. Salajane peainspektori raport, mis valmis 2005 aasta mais tuvastas, et kaitseministeeriumi ametnikud edastasid komisjonile "ebatäpset infot" õhukaitse käitumise osas 11. septembril 2001, kuid ei öelnud, kas see oli "tedlikult vale". Uus uurimine peaks tuvastama, kas Pentagoni mehed valetasid teadlikult. AFP uudis allpool, samuti võiks teemaga otseselt seostuda artikkel Vanity Fair'is pealkirjaga 9/11 Live: The NORAD Tapes. Lahkelt saab lugeda ja kuulata, mida siis paljukiidetud Põhja Ameerika õhuruumi kaitsekeskuse klemmid omavahel rääkisid sel saatuslikul päeval.
Pentagon inaccuracies on 9/11 air defense probed
WASHINGTON (AFP) - The Pentagon said its inspector general is investigating whether officials provided "knowingly false" information to a special commission that investigated the September 11, 2001 attacks.
A secret inspector general's report in May 2005 concluded that Defense Department officials provided inaccurate information about the air defense response to the attacks, but did not say whether it was "knowingly false," said Lieutenant Colonel Brian Maka.
The inspector general "will be issuing a report in the near future that will directly address the question of whether the testimony was knowingly false," he said.
Vanity Fair, meanwhile, published a detailed account of the air defense response drawn from audiotapes made in the northeastern command center of the North American Aerospace Defense Command as the attacks unfolded.
The tapes show that no command was given to shoot down United Flight 93 as implied by Vice President Dick Cheney and other top officials, the magazine said.
The airliner crashed in a field in Pennsylvania before anyone in the military chain of command even knew it had been hijacked.
Cheney was not informed of the possibility that the United flight had been hijacked until 10:02 am, just one minute before it impacted the ground.
Among other inaccuracies, Major General Larry Arnold and Colonel Alan Scott testified they began tracking United Flight 93 at 9:16 am, but the plane had not been hijacked at that point.
NORAD's northeastern headquarters was not notified of the hijacking for another 51 minutes, the Vanity Fair account said.
The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks on the United States uncovered the inaccuracies during the course of its investigation, and the Pentagon corrected the 2003 testimony in May 2004, Maka said.
The Washington Post reported that some staff and commission members concluded that the inaccuracies were a deliberate attempt to mislead the commission, and debated referring the matter to the Justice Department for a criminal investigation.
As a compromise, the commission asked the inspector generals of the Pentagon and the Transportation Department to perform an inquiry into whether the information was knowingly false.
A secret Defense Department inspector general's report in May 2005 concluded that the Defense Department "did not accurately report to the 9/11 Commission on the air defense response to the September 11, 2001 hijackings."
"The inaccuracies in part, resulted because of inadequate forensic capabilities and insufficient actions taken to ensure complete and accurate reporting of the events related to the 9/11 hijackings."
But it did not directly address the commission's question as to whether they were "knowingly false." Yahoo News
< RIAA kaebab Limewire kohtusse
| BP sulgeb Alaskal naftapuuraugud >
| |
| | |
|
Pentagoni ametnikud 9/11 "ebatäpsuste" pärast uurimise all
|
Logi sisse/tee kasutajakonto
| Top
| 4 kommentaari
| otsi arutelust
|
|
|
|
peenes kirjas:
Järgmised kommentaarid kuuluvad nende autoritele.
Meie ei vastuta nende eest kuidagi.
|
Küll võttis ikka aega nende lindistuste "lindistamine". Või arvati, et kui varem välja annavad, siis tundub kahtlane?
Igatahes. Kui tõesti oli nii, nagu neil lintidel kuulda, siis jäeti NORAD tõesti mängust välja.
|
|
|
[ vasta sellele | artikkel
]
|
|
teatud tasemel ametnikud kindlasti aga NORADi direktor sai ametikõrgendust - see annab ainet mõtlemiseks nagu arvas suur Stirlitz ... Men stumble over the truth from time to time, but most pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had happened..
|
|
|
[ vasta sellele | artikkel
]
|
|
kusjuures, näiteks selle delfi uudise [delfi.ee] puhul tundub mulle, et see on hasbara [minut.ee] osa - mingi fotograaf on Iisraeli poolt palgatud, et mingit jama korraldada. Nii et üks uus strateegia bushidel on jätta muljet, et teine pool on nendega sarnane - vaadeldes sündmuse tausta. selle vastu saab olema tüütu sõdida :)
t
|
|
|
[ vasta sellele | artikkel
]
|
|
ja kõik need uurimised (mille materjalid võivad omakorda olla võltsing) ja "tsiviliseeritud" riikide noomitused Iisraelile jms. - selle suhtes tasub ka kahtlev olla. st. mitte võtta seda kõike tõsiselt enne, kui on näha reaalseid tulemusi, ja mitte ühte pisikest reaalset tulemust, vaid selgeid asju, tegevust ja tulemusi.
t
|
|
|
[ vasta sellele | artikkel
]
|
|
|
|
 |
|